Superheroic Masculinity – The Incredible Hulk

Guest post by Joseph Voltz.

We’ll continue our look at masculinity in the modern superhero by taking on the unstoppable force himself, Marvel’s Incredible Hulk. There have been several different interpretations, origins, and incarnations of the Hulk, depending on the writer’s vision. I will be speaking in general terms that reflect across most notions of the Hulk.

The Hulk, of “HULK SMASH!” fame, draws most of its narrative premise from Robert Louis Stevenson’s classic tale “Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde” and applies a modern dose of superhuman origin story. Bruce Banner, fictional genius, creates a gamma bomb with his considerable talents. Through an ironic twist, he winds up exposed to the gamma radiation. Though Banner does not die, he finds that moments of extreme stress and anger cause him to undergo a physical (and mental) metamorphosis until he is completely transformed into the Incredible Hulk, a green rage-driven engine of destruction.

Widespread destruction ensues until the Hulk reverts back to his alter-ego of Bruce Banner. The hero’s major conflict comes from this dichotomy and the havoc the Hulk wreaks on Banner’s personal life.

Bruce Banner possesses a brilliant mind, even in a world populated by superheroes and otherworldly intelligences. He is remarkable enough in the world that other superbeings come to him for advice and solutions to scientific problems. Bruce Banner delights in solving the problems of the world using his bright intellect.

Beyond that, he finds himself emotionally withdrawn from people for a number of reasons, chief among them being his alter ego. Despite this lack of social emotion, Bruce does harbor feelings of shame, panic, and fear. He simply wants to be able to live his life without the Hulk persona. Underneath all that, Banner represents logical thinking and positive emotion.

On the other hand, the Hulk uses his vast strength to punch things, mostly. When Banner transforms into the Hulk, he typically loses control over his thoughts, reverting to a primal state of mind, where survival supersedes all other thoughts, and rage seems the only emotion. Not only that, but the Hulk draws his power from his rage, actually increasing his strength in direct proportion to the level of anger he feels at the time.

The Hulk is a destructive force to such a degree that his presence necessitated the formation of the Avengers team of superheroes in order to stop him from senselessly rampaging across the country for no particular reason. He has been exiled to space because he cannot be stopped, either by force or by reason. The Hulk is brute force incarnate, driven by instinct and negative emotions like anger and hate.

On the one hand, we have Banner, master of cool intellect and rational problem solving. On the other, we have the Hulk, a mindless rampaging monster who regularly defeats the entire U.S. Armed Forces as par for the course.

Banner has limited to no control over when he transforms into the Hulk. His role in the change is passive, as he relies on outside stimuli to effect the emotions that fuel the change. Once he’s the Hulk, he makes no effort (having no control) to change back, instead using his time and energy to destroy all that upsets him.

How does all this reflect on masculinity?

I believe the Hulk persona represents a hyper-masculine interpretation of power. Power in the Hulk’s world means the ability to solve problems by causing the problem to cease existing. Where Banner would like to solve problems by puzzling them out, the Hulk would punch it out. Additionally, the Hulk completely consumes the Banner persona, rendering it incapable of making rational decisions or complicated reasoning.

Banner’s personality complicates things further. Various writers have depicted Banner as a recluse, a survivor of abuse, and a stew of psychological problems. Though Banner may attempt to treat these issues in a healthy fashion, they usually act as triggering mechanisms for his incredible transformation. Rather than teaching comic readers to deal with their problems in a constructive way, the writers show that resorting to brute strength produces results quicker and often “solves” a problem, however temporarily.

This seems to be a stereotypical example of a man hiding his emotions and putting on a strong front. “Hulking out” represents taking this to the extreme, as Banner loses every part of what makes him a person in favor of a mindless, one-emotion force of aggression and destruction.

Is this a good interpretation of masculinity? Decidedly not. Using power to satisfy base and animal instincts is not a good representation of masculinity, even less so when triggering emotions or situations are covered up in the process.

However, the Hulk story captures more than simply aggression and power. When the Hulk is not leveling city blocks or headbutting meteors, Bruce Banner is left to deal with reality and the consequences of the Hulk. The conflicts of Banner reveal a more nuanced interpretation of the dichotomy between force and thought that the Hulk comic book focuses on.

Which persona is more popular with readers? Just look at the title of the comic.


See also: Superheroic Masculinity – Captain America

 This guest post was authored by Joseph Voltz, a recent alumnus of Lehigh University, with a degree in history and a minor in sociology. He is a current graduate student at Lehigh, pursuing a Masters of Arts degree in public history. Joe has worked as a congressional intern, and actively participates in the gender equality movement. His interests include science fiction, gaming, alternative popular culture, and comics, which he hopes to examine in future posts. In short, he is a bit of a geek, with a feminist twist.
About these ads

5 thoughts on “Superheroic Masculinity – The Incredible Hulk

  1. Pingback: Superheroic Masculinity – Captain America | MasculinityU

  2. It should also be noted that the 2008 theatrical incarnation of “The Incredible Hulk” (starring Edward Norton) places a heavy emphasis on Bruce Banner’s struggle to control the Hulk’s rage. At both the beginning and end of the film, Banner is seen seeking spiritual counseling, attempting to control his alter ego.

    In one of the major turning points of the movie, the fight scene on Culver University’s campus, Banner manages to break through the Hulk’s hyper-masculine rage and protect a loved one from harm. Later, in the movie’s climax, he is able to fully utilize his abilities to stop an exaggerated version of himself from destroying the world.

    By the end of the film, Banner has started down a path of controlling his anger and abilities, an act for which he (and the screenwriters) should be commended.

    Many men, myself included, experience negative feelings at one time or another, and many of us have also lost control. We may not turn green, undergo a tenfold increase in muscle mass, and start talking like Lou Ferrigno, but the potential for unthinking destruction is often just as great.

    This newest interpretation of Banner and the Hulk teaches viewers to responsibly control those negative emotions and seek a productive outcome, a goal all men should strive for. I would therefore argue that this film represents a step in the right direction for the Hulk franchise, imparting on young viewers an idea of what masculinity is really about.

  3. This is a really interesting synopsis, and could be applied to numerous different areas of study. Obviously this is a forum to discuss masculinity, but it sounds very much like a feminist approach. (Please do not take this the wrong way.) In saying that I mean, that the feminist approach seeks to identify gender in broader subjects (male and female) in order to show how gender stereotyping can lead to flawed assumptions on the nature of such areas as realism, liberalism, marxism etc. in relation to international and domestic politics. I feel that you are truly on to something, but you should consider applying it to other areas of study. I must note that this is my first time reading material from this site, so that may already be the case with other articles that have been previously written.

    Meg D.

  4. Pingback: The Three Hulks: Eric Bana, Edward Norton and Mark Ruffalo « Radu presents: The Movie-Photo Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s